Partner Booklet — May 2026

CryptaVeritas

Cryptographic verification protocol for trading signals. Every signal is hash-committed before reveal — verify it yourself, no trust required.

Token $VERAX (Solana)
License GPL v3.0
Phase 1 Complete
Tests 14/14
Telegram t.me/cryptaveritas
01 — Problem and solution

The signal market runs on trust.
We replace trust with math.

Problem

Fabricated track records

Signal sources delete losing forecasts, change entry points retroactively, and publish different signals to different groups. Users have no tool for independent verification.

Solution

Commit-Reveal protocol

Before publishing a signal, its SHA-256 hash with salt is recorded. After reveal, anyone can recompute the hash and confirm it was not altered. Mathematical proof, not reputational.

"Every signal. Cryptographically proven."
B2B slogan
02 — How it works

Three steps. Zero trust.

01

Commit

Signal source publishes SHA-256 hash with domain prefix and random salt. Signal content is unknown.

cryptasignals:v1|signal|{data}|{salt}
02

Reveal

Worker decrypts AES-256-GCM, verifies hash, publishes signal with status to channel.

VERIFIED / INVALID_HASH / NO_SECRET
03

Verify

Anyone recomputes the hash independently in browser or via CLI. No server trust required.

cryptaveritas.github.io/cryptaveritas-verify
03 — Technical stack

Production-ready. Node.js 20 LTS.

ComponentTechnology
RuntimeNode.js 20 LTS
LanguageTypeScript 5
DatabaseSQLite WAL (better-sqlite3)
CryptographyAES-256-GCM + SHA-256 (Node.js crypto)
ValidationZod .strict() + .refine() (SignalSchema)
BotgrammY (Telegram) — primary + backup
TestingJest + ts-jest — 14/14 passing
TokenSolana SPL — $VERAX
MultisigSquads v4 (treasury + OTC vault)
04 — Security

10 attack vectors. 10 closed.

Replay attacks
Domain prefix cryptasignals:v1|signal|
Timing attacks
crypto.timingSafeEqual
IV reuse in AES
Random IV per encryption
Prompt Injection
Zod .strict() + Depth Guard (20 levels)
Time-Jacking (NTP)
process.hrtime.bigint() monitoring
SQLITE_BUSY
busy_timeout = 5000ms
WAL data loss
wal_checkpoint(TRUNCATE) on shutdown
Key memory leak
clearMasterKey() — key zeroed on shutdown
Overlapping worker
isProcessing flag in setInterval
DoS via nesting
LIMIT 100 in getPendingCommits
05 — Tests

14 tests. 3 suites. All green.

Test Suites: 3 passed | Tests: 14 passed | Node.js 20 LTS
crypto.test.ts — 4 tests
toStrictString is deterministic
domainHash is stable and unique
verifyCommitment correct (true/false)
createCommitment generates compatible data
revealWorker.test.ts — 5 tests
Skip before deadline
FORCED REVEAL — TARGET_HIT on valid commit
NO_SECRET when encrypted_secret missing
INVALID_HASH on hash mismatch
DECRYPT_FAILED on invalid secret
database.test.ts — 5 tests
saveCommitment + getPendingCommits
getCommitmentByHash
markAsRevealed + idempotency
updateLastForceAttempt
LIMIT 100 under high load
06 — Roadmap

From MVP to protocol.

01May 2026
Complete

CryptaSignals MVP

Commit-Reveal core, AES-256-GCM, SQLite WAL, Telegram bot (primary + backup), HTTP API, public verifier, 14/14 tests, GitHub Pages.

02Weeks 3-8
Next

Growth and monetization

Token-gated access via $VERAX, B2B Pro/Enterprise with commercial license, Drip Reveal, multi-oracle (Birdeye + Pyth), OTC pre-launch via Squads v4.

03Months 3-6
Planned

Infrastructure migration

Onchain pre-commit hashes on Solana, agent reputation ERC-8004 on Base, staking contract, verified signal source marketplace, Soulbound NFTs, KMS/HSM.

04Months 6-12+
Planned

Full CryptaVeritas protocol

ZK proofs (Noir + zkVerify), decentralized validators with slashing, onchain credit scoring for AI agents, DeFAI partnerships.

07 — Monetization

Token as access. Not as investment.

B2C

Private signals

Hold 1,000 $VERAX

Offchain RPC check, hourly. No fiat, no contracts, no KYC.

B2B Lite

Basic API

Hold 10,000 $VERAX

Verification API access. Phase 3 — staking contract on Solana.

B2B Pro

Extended API

Hold 50,000 $VERAX

Extended API, priority support. Phase 4 — ZK verification.

Enterprise

White label

Official contract

$VERAX, USDC, USDT or fiat via Coinbase Commerce. SLA, dedicated support.

08 — Legal triggers

Trigger model. No upfront costs.

00

Now — pre-launch

No legal entity, no payments, no commercial agreements. B2C and B2B access via $VERAX holdings only.

01

First corporate client requesting official contract

Immediate legal entity registration. Corporate = company, fund, or DAO requiring invoice and formal agreement.

02

First incoming Enterprise payment

Treasury multisig (2/3) accepts $VERAX, USDC, USDT. Fiat via Coinbase Commerce if needed. Bank account on client request only.

03

First Enterprise contract signed

Legal opinion on $VERAX (MiCA compliance). Decision on $CIPCRY integration.

09 — Tokenomics

100,000,000 VERAX. Solana.

Team
6-month cliff, 36 months linear
15%
Treasury
Multisig 2 of 3 (Squads v4)
25%
Community and airdrops
20% immediately, 80% over 12 months
10%
Marketing and partnerships
25% immediately, 75% over 12 months
10%
Initial liquidity
LP burned (Raydium + Orca)
40%
10 — Competitive landscape

No direct competitors. Niche is open.

ProjectApproachLimitation
Alpha ImpactPost-fact verification via onchain tradesNo pre-commit
KnidosZK verification of closed fund resultsNot for public signals
CryptoNinjasSelf-reporting with public P&LNo cryptography
DeFAI market

$10B

Crypto.com Research, 2025

Use AI

37%

Of market participants

Unverified signals

58%

Rely on social media

11 — Contact

Open verifier. Closed core.

Public — GPL v3.0
cryptaveritas-verify

Hash verifier: index.html (browser) + cli-verify.js (Node.js). Open source.

GitHub Pages — Live
cryptaveritas.github.io/cryptaveritas-verify

Live verifier. Tested with real hashes.

Public roadmap
github.com/cryptaveritas/roadmap

All phases, progress, and upcoming features.

Private core
cryptasignals-phase1

Full protocol core. TypeScript, SQLite, AES-256-GCM.

Telegram channel
CryptaVeritas | Proof of Signal
Link
t.me/cryptaveritas
Enterprise inquiries
Via Telegram channel
11 — NexusVeritas

Behavioral operator
intelligence for Solana.

Most tools ask: is this token safe? NexusVeritas asks: who is behind this token, and what is their history? Operator class and token risk are independent dimensions.

Core insight

operator_class ≠ token_risk

A casual creator can produce a critical-risk token. An industrial deployer can produce a safe one. Traditional scanners miss this entirely — they analyze the wrong object.

Live status

565 operators classified

8 archetypes. pgvector similarity search. Live API: GET /api/v2/scan/solana/:mint. Returns score, reasons, operator_class, isHardRefuse.

ArchetypeCountPattern
INDUSTRIAL_DEPLOYER315500+ tokens, invisible funding, automated
PROFESSIONAL_CREATOR12720-500 tokens, sustained activity
EXCHANGE_FUNDED_DEPLOYER31Industrial + verified exchange funding
ROTATION_OPERATOR30Burst deployment, 0 days active
INFRASTRUCTURE_HUB24High SOL inflow, distribution node
CASUAL_CREATOR20<20 tokens, organic activity
WALLET_FACTORY15Single-use wallets, 0.002 SOL init
WALLET_FACTORY_HUB3Factory hub with recycling patterns
VERAX TierRequirementAccess
NX Basic5,000 VERAXOperator scan API — score, archetype, reasons
NX Pro25,000 VERAXFull API — similarity search, batch, history
EnterpriseContractWhite label, SLA, VERAX/USDC/fiat
"The contract is clean. The operator is not."
NexusVeritas — github.com/cryptaveritas/nexusveritas-api